Most of the big names are off the board so now the baseball world slowly turns its eyes to arbitration… and… money, money who’s gonna get the money…
The crew discusses a couple of key arbitration cases that may be coming up as well as… the DH… in the NL?
1) The Toronto Blue Jays are going to arbitration with Josh Donaldson, the reigning AL MVP, over $458,888.., he wants $11.8 mil; they offered $11.35 million. Your opinion on the Jay’s move?
Dan: To me, it’s stupid. This is a waste of time for both sides. Not only is Donaldson the reigning MVP and coming off an amazing season, but, the dollar amount is only $458,888. You can give him the extra amount, it’s not that big of a deal in my opinion. Or, at least up the price you’re giving him a little bit.
Not only does this hurt both sides’ opinions of each other, but, it gives a bad impression to the fans as well that they’re not willing to give him a little extra money in order to keep him. Just give him the extra money or come to a mutual agreement in the middle and call it a day.
The Jays should just meet half way and get it over with. No risk alienating Donaldson over a few dollars.
Add whatever other words you’d like to describe what the Jays are doing here. As soon as they saw what the figure that Donaldson wanted and noticed the difference between his figure and theirs… a difference that amounts to pocket change for a MLB team these days they should have just told Donaldson let’s just forget arbitration and say it’s a done deal… in other words… just pay him the money.
Steve: Seriously? Pay the guy! You cannot cause any friction at all with someone the caliber of Josh Donaldson. This guy is going to be good for several more years, and will probably compete for another MVP next year. This is chump change for what the Jays have on their payroll. I don’t think he is being unreasonable at all. Just give the guy the extra money, it will be worth it in the long run.
2) St, Louis Cardinals’ GM John Mozeliak, recently suggested that, in discussions with NL GMs, there is more momentum for the DH being adapted into NL lineups. What’s your thinking… “Oh, my God may the saints preserves us and the sanctity of the way baseball was meant to b played” or “What the hell took the dummies so damn long” or something that might fall between the two given stances?
Dan: My thoughts are to just do it. They keep talking about it, either they need to implement it or just leave it alone. They keep throwing it around the talking heads, why not just do it.if it doesn’t work now, they can always come back to it. But. might as well get it rolling and see how GMs react.
It’ll end up happening eventually.
Look, no disrespect to the few pitchers that can swing a bat but too many teams have an absolute black hole at the #9 spot. Forget tradition. Let’s move on and add the DH to the NL.
Joe: I’ve always been kinda, sorta on the fence on this issue but now I’ve finally come to the conclusion that what the hell, since ever other league from T-ball to Little League to Sand Lot to College ball to MiLB to the AL use the DH then why not the NL, too?
So, I guess my answer to this question is… “What the hell took the dummies so damn long?”
Steve: I have always been torn between wanting the DH and not wanting the DH in the National League. I think they just need to make a decision and stick with it. I think players and fans will get on board with whatever they decide to do.
I would however, say that pitchers should not be eligible for the MVP if they don’t bat. That is just my opinion on the matter. I think health wise it would be a smart idea to prevent pitchers from getting hurt while at the plate.
3) The Kansas City Royals are said to have agreed to a five-year deal with free-agent starter Ian Kennedy that is worth $70 million… aka $14 million a year. The deal reportedly includes an opt-out clause after 2 years. They also lose their first round draft pick as Kennedy was given a qualifying offer.
FYI: Kennedy, 31, who was with the San Diego Padres, in a pitcher friendly ball park, had stats that included a 9-15 record, 4.28 ERA, 174 strikeouts, 168 innings pitched, 1.30 WHIP and gave up 31 home runs.
The question: Is this an act of desperation by the Royals or a good investment of their money?
His numbers in San Diego were not good, especially for the type of contract he received. I think this was more of an act of desperation by Kansas City than a good investment of their money. I didn’t see the need of signing him by Kansas City for that much especially for the season he just had. Besides his 2011 season in which he had 21 wins and a 2.88 ERA, the rest of his career has been below average and just a disappointment.
This move doesn’t make sense to me.
Makes little sense to offer Kennedy that much money but the Royals have not misfired on too many personnel decisions lately so I will give them the benefit of the doubt.
Having said that… when the hell did an under .500 win/loss record; an ERA over 4 runs per game. a WHIP of 1.30 plus the fact that the pitcher being discussed… Kennedy… gave up over 30 taters…
When did all of that suddenly merit being paid $14 million a year?
This is an act of desperation by the Royals.
I may be proved to be entirely wrong in my opinion when the final stats are totaled for Kenendy after the 2016 season is in the books but I kinda don’t think this guy is gonna really improve on those numbers all that much…. number 4 rotation pitchers now get $14 mil a year… who would of thunk it?
I thought that the Royals would be taking a step back after losing guys like Zobrist and Cueto, but, they added Kennedy, and kept Gordon and Cain. So, I think the Royals will be right back in the thick of things next season.
4) Brandon Phillips recently said no to a deal that would have sent him to the Washington Nationals. As a 10/5 player… 10 years in MLB and 5 with the Reds, he has that right. However considering that it looks like the Reds are tearing apart the team and rebuilding was that a good move on Phillips’ part?
Dan: As a Reds’ fan and If I were a Reds’ front office member, I wouldn’t like the move he pulled. They’re trying to rebuild completely and start from scratch. His blocking an attempt at that won’t bode well.
But, I think he made a good move. He knows what he’s doing. If he stays, he can be the face of the franchise and be a big part in their rebuilding. He also can pick and choose what team he goes to, so he can still end up accepting a trade to a contender or a team that will for sure make the playoffs this season (or expected to). But, I think it was a good move on his part for reasons that I’m pretty sure are the reasons he did so.
Loyalty is nice, no doubt, but winning is better.
Then when you have done that… go tell the Reds that you’ve had a change of heart and that you would love to be traded to the Nationals.
He is in the wrong place if he is trying to win, because the Reds are several years away from competing again. The Nats would have been a good fit for him, but, if he wants to stay in Cincy, that sounds more like a personal problem to me.
5) Pitcher Jake Arrieta filed for $13 million, the Chicago Cubs offered $7.5 million for their arbitration figures. Does this get settled before they go to the arbitration hearing or do the two participants come to an agreement for in-between dollars?
If they do wind up in arbitration do you think that will ultimately do harm to Arietta’s relationship with the Cubs?
Dan: I think Jake Arrieta and the Cubs are going to arbitration. They’re too far off in their numbers for them to get something settled in my opinion, so, they’ll end up going to arbitration and I think that it will end up resulting in Arrieta’s favor.
But, yes, I do think this hurts the relationship between the Cubs’ organization and Arrieta. He was the main reason the Cubs did what they did this year. He had an amazing, never before seen second half of the season, and, they end up low-balling him when it comes to contract talks. Kind of a slap in the face to Arrieta by Chicago.
Earl: I doubt it impacts their relationship but like the Donaldson question, I don’t get why these two sides can’t meet in the middle.Jake deserves his cash but the Cubs should have came in at $11 million.
Would have made more sense.
The Cubs need Arrieta to be happy and they do not want to go into an arbitration hearing and have to start laying out exactly why Arrieta is not worth what he wants and instead is only worth what they have offered. I mean why take the chance of creating ill feelings with their ace?
Besides, in my opinion, if they go to arbitration and then say all the negative stuff about Arrieta in an attempt to win it will all be an exorcise in futility… Arrieta being the reigning NL Cy Young Award winner is going to win and get his money… the Cubs need to settle and avoid any hearing. There has to be a number that they both can be happy with.
While 6 million doesn’t sound like a lot in contract terms for a MLB player. They are quite far a part. Arrieta had a great year in 2015, but, Theo should not jump the gun after one good season, he is smarter than that. Now, if, Arreita comes close to his production next year, then absolutely pay the man.
This day in baseball history…
1953… Cardinal legend Dizzy Dean and outfielder Al Simmons, best known for his years with the A’s, are elected to the Hall of Fame, but Joe DiMaggio in his first year of eligibility is not. The Yankee Clipper will have to wait until 1955 when 88.8% of the BBWAA scribes put his name on their ballot.
1969… In his first year of eligibility, Cardinal legend Stan Musial is elected into the Hall of Fame, receiving 93% of the writers’ votes. The BBWAA also selects Roy Campanella, the former Dodger catcher who won three National League MVPs before he was permanently disabled in a car accident just prior to the start of spring training in 1958.
1971… No player receives three-fourths of the necessary votes to be elected into the Hall of Fame, with Yogi Berra (67.2%) and Early Wynn (66.7%) coming the closest.
Tiny URL for this post: