The Weekly Technology News 1/18 Edition

 

The Weekly Technology News 1/18 Edition

Welcome to this week’s edition of my Weekly Technology Newstechnology

Few Gleanings from my perusing the Internet.

FCC to Redefine “Broadband” as 25 Mbps or Faster – A huge chunk of the U.S. may no longer have “broadband” service soon, if a new plan by federal regulators to change the definition of high-speed access is approved. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler proposed Wednesday to increase the U.S. definition of broadband to 25 megabits per second, saying the current definition of 4 Mbps just doesn’t cut it anymore. That “dated” standard is “inadequate for evaluating whether broadband capable of supporting today’s high-quality voice, data, graphics and video is being deployed to all Americans in a timely way,” according to an FCC fact sheet about the proposal.

Sprints Latest Promo Drives 700 Percent Increase in Retail Traffic – According to new research from Placed, a company that tracks location through mobile phones on an opt-in basis, the first week of Sprint’s “Cut Your Bill in Half” promotion increased foot traffic at Sprint retail shops by 700 percent week over week compared to competitors AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon. Even though Sprint is a distant third in that list, the recent promotion saw their overall market share rise nearly 3 percent from the recent increase in store visits.

SlingHow the Great Unbundling of Pay TV Could Backfire on Consumers – Today the oversized cable bundle remains the standard, but the door to unraveling the cable package has been opened, thanks to the arrival of a broad variety of viewing options—notably including standalone streaming options from HBO, the Dish Network, and Netflix that require no cable package. However, analysts have long warned that we should be careful what we wish for in terms of an a la carte viewing future. In 2010, the New Yorker reported that if the bundle disappeared, the cost per customer for each channel would soar, “perhaps on a customer-by-customer basis.” The likely result would be that loads of channels would go out of business, and that the average customer would pay roughly the same amount monthly he was paying for the big bundle. And in light of Dish’s rollout of Sling TV this week, the New York Times summed up previous research on the topic of how an a la carte TV scene would play out, writing, “contrary to many peoples’ intuition, the unbundling of cable service could actually lead to slightly higher prices for fewer channels.”

 

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, online; CNET. Boy Genius Report; SlashGear; The Verge. Fortune (Money), online. Android Authority; GeekWire; Wireless Week, online. Ars Technica; Consumerist; Re/code; SlashGear.

Tiny URL for this post:
 

Comments

comments

About David Snipes 1332 Articles
Thank you for stopping by. Feel free to email me Ideas, suggestions and grape haterade.

5 Comments

  1. In terms of internet, customers in the US pay higher rates for slower service than almost everyone else in the world. [Citation needed] Sound a lot like medical care? I wonder if there is a connection?

  2. Keep in mind the GIANT size of the US.
    For DSL, you have to be within 4.3 miles of the network to even get the lowest speed.

    To get 6, you have to be within 1.1 miles of the network box. Thats about a 2 mile radius.

  3. So our size is an issue, but it is also a benefit. At my rural summer home I have radio contact with an ISP whose transmitter/receiver is five miles away. I pay less for it and get faster service than for broadband service at my urban winter home. To get faster service in my urban local, I would have to dig into my pockets a lot deeper.

  4. What speed do you get?
    Up and Down please.

    How many people are on your circuit?

    I do see your point, but I don’t think we will have truly fast and cheap internet until it goes satellite.

  5. What speed do you get?
    100 Mbps is given for my urban broadband,m but performance falls way short.

    How many people are on your circuit?
    Unknown.

    I do see your point, but I don’t think we will have truly fast and cheap internet until it goes satellite.
    I agree. I haven’t checked it out, but I believe that my rural service is connected to the tower five
    miles away via satellite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*